Performance
Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow:

Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to locate and compare
performance measurement data on common health conditions for the hospitals in
your area. You will investigate the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
websites and locate hospital compare data for hospitals within a 50 mile radius
of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical
experiences. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation and share the results
of your findings. Opportunities for improving performance measurement indicators
will be shared.

Course Outcomes

Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet
the following course outcomes.

CO 1: Apply leadership concepts,
skills, and decision making in the provision of high-quality nursing care,
healthcare team management, and the oversight and accountability for care
delivery in a variety of settings. (PO 2)

CO 2: Implement patient safety and
quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional
team through communication and relationship building. (PO 3)

CO 3: Participate in the development
and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to
change. (PO 7)

CO 7: Apply leadership concepts in
the development and initiation of effective plans for the microsystems and
system-wide practice improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare
delivery. (POs 2 and 3)

CO 8: Apply concepts of quality and
safety using structure, process and outcome measures to identify clinical
questions as the beginning process of changing current practice. (PO 8)

Due Dates

This assignment is to be submitted to the Dropbox by Sunday,
11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6.

Points

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Directions

1. Review information found on the following website related to hospital
compare http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalCompare.html

2. Read the information carefully and then locate the following website. http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare

3. Search for hospitals within a 50 mile radius of the community where you
are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. Type in your zip
code. Select your hospital and two
others. Select hospitals/facilities
and choose compare. If you live in a
remote area and there are no
hospitals listed within a 50 mile radius, select a zip code for a family member
or a close friend who does not live near you. The idea is to review comparative
data.

4. Click on the following topics to learn more.

a. Survey of patient’s experiences

b. Timely and effective care (focus your search on two of the conditions
that apply to services provided at the hospitals)

c. Readmissions, complications, and deaths

5. Carefully read the information
provided.

6. Develop
a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8–10 slides. Include the following,
keeping in mind what all this data means.

a.
Title slide with information pertinent to the
course.

b.
List reasons to recommend hospital compare to
consumers (patients).

c.
List reasons to recommend hospital compare to
staff who may seek employment.

For d., e., and f.
(below), slides are clearly labeled as Hospital A, B or C.

d.
Summarize patient experiences data for each
hospital.

e.
Summarize timely and effective care data for two
conditions.

f.
Summarize data for readmissions or complications
and deaths.

g.
List recommendations for improving data for one
selected facility.

h.
Summarize what you learned from this experience.

7. Develop
PowerPoint slides to include criteria listed above. For those not familiar with
the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link may be helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx

8. Submit
your PowerPoint slideshow to the Dropbox.

Grading Criteria: Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow

Category	Points	%	Description
Title slide	10	10%	Slide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.
Reasons to recommend hospital compare to patients	20	20%	Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.
Reasons to recommend hospital compare to staff	30	20%	Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.
Summarize data related to patient experiences	30	30%	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is displayed.
Summarize data related to timely and effective care	30	30%	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and applied to hospitals A, B, and C.
Summarize data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths	30	30%	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are appropriately displayed.
Recommendations for improving data for one facility	20	20%	Either hospital A, B, or C is specified, or recommendations for improving data are appropriately displayed.
Summary of learning related to this assignment	20	20%	Learning about completing this assignment is stated. Summary of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.
Scholarly writing and formatting	10	10%	Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check.
Total	200 points	100%	A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance A	Very Good or High Level of Performance B	Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance C	Poor, Failing, or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance F
Title slide 10 points	Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member. 9–10 points	Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing. 8 points	Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing. 7 points	Slide contains most information; however, more than three components are missing or slide is missing. 0–6 points
Reasons to recommend hospital compare to patients 20 points	At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the patient’s perspective. 18–20 points	At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the patient’s perspective. 16–17 points	Less than three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to patient’s perspective. 14–15 points	Less than three reasons are included and are not logical and easy to read. They are not from the patient’s perspective. 0–13 points
Reasons to recommend hospital compare to staff 30 points	At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff member’s perspective. 28–30 points	At least three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff member’s perspective. 25–27 points	Less than three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff member’s perspective. 23–24 points	Less than three reasons are included and are not logical and easy to read. They are not from the potential staff member’s perspective. 0–22 points
Summarize data related to patient experiences 30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is thoroughly displayed. 28–30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is clearly displayed. 25–27 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C, and data related to patient experiences is briefly displayed. 23–24 points	Hospitals are not labeled appropriately, and data related to patient experiences is difficult to ascertain. 0–22 points
Summarize data related to timely and effective care 30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and concisely applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 28–30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 25–27 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. One condition is named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 23–24 points	Only one or two hospitals are listed and labeled appropriately. Three or fewer hospitals are labeled appropriately. One or no conditions are named and applied. 0–22 points
Summarize data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths 30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are thoroughly displayed. 28–30 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B and C and data related to readmissions, complications and deaths is clearly displayed 25–27 points	Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions or complications or deaths (but not all three) is briefly displayed. 23–24 points	Hospitals are not labeled appropriately and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths is difficult to ascertain. 0–22 points
Recommendations for improving data for one facility 20 points	One of three hospitals is selected. At least five recommendations for improving data are listed and thoroughly described. 18–20 points	One of three hospitals is selected. Three to four recommendations for improving data are listed clearly described. 16–17 points	One of three hospitals is selected. Two recommendations for improving data are listed briefly described. 14–15 points	One or no hospitals are listed. One recommendation for improving data is listed and recommendations are difficult to understand. 0–13 points
Summary of learning related to this assignment 20 points	Thoroughly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data 18–20 points	Clearly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data 16–17 points	Briefly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; does not include value of data 14–15 points	Summary of learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain 0–13 points
Scholarly writing and formatting 10 points	All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. 9–10 points	Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 8 points	Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 7 points	Multiple typos are noted. Multiple grammar and punctuation errors are noted. There is no evidence of proofreading prior to submitting the assignment. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 0–6 points
Total Points Possible = 200	Your Score=	A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Assignment
Criteria

Outstanding
or Highest Level of Performance

Very
Good or High Level of Performance

Competent
or Satisfactory Level of Performance

Poor,
Failing, or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Title
slide

10
points

Slide contains all pertinent
information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

9–10 points

Slide contains most
information; however, one component is missing.

8 points

Slide contains most
information; however, two to three components are missing.

7 points

Slide contains most
information; however, more than three components are missing or slide is
missing.

0–6 points

Reasons
to recommend hospital compare to patients

20
points

At least four reasons
are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the
patient’s perspective.

18–20 points

At least three reasons
are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the
patient’s perspective.

16–17 points

Less than three
reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related
to patient’s perspective.

14–15 points

Less than three
reasons are included and are not logical and easy to read. They are not from
the patient’s perspective.

0–13 points

Reasons
to recommend hospital compare to staff

30
points

At least four reasons
are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the
potential staff member’s perspective.

28–30 points

At least three
reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related
to the potential staff member’s perspective.

25–27 points

Less than three
reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related
to the potential staff member’s perspective.

23–24 points

Less than three
reasons are included and are not logical and easy to read. They are not from
the potential staff member’s perspective.

0–22 points

Summarize
data related to patient experiences

30
points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is thoroughly
displayed.

28–30 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is clearly
displayed.

25–27 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C, and data related to patient experiences is briefly
displayed.

23–24 points

Hospitals are not
labeled appropriately, and data related to patient experiences is difficult
to ascertain.

0–22 points

Summarize
data related to timely and effective care

30
points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and concisely applied to hospitals A, B, and C.

28–30 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C.

25–27 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C. One condition is named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C.

23–24 points

Only one or two
hospitals are listed and labeled appropriately. Three or fewer hospitals are
labeled appropriately. One or no
conditions are named and applied.

0–22 points

Summarize
data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths

30
points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions, complications, and
deaths are thoroughly displayed.

28–30 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B and C and data related to readmissions, complications and deaths
is clearly displayed

25–27 points

Three hospitals are
labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions or complications or
deaths (but not all three) is briefly displayed.

23–24 points

Hospitals are not
labeled appropriately and data related to readmissions, complications, and
deaths is difficult to ascertain.

0–22 points

Recommendations
for improving data for one facility

20
points

One of three
hospitals is selected. At least five recommendations for improving data are
listed and thoroughly described.

18–20 points

One of three hospitals
is selected. Three to four recommendations for improving data are listed
clearly described.

16–17 points

One of three
hospitals is selected. Two recommendations for improving data are listed
briefly described.

14–15 points

One or no hospitals are
listed. One recommendation for improving data is listed and recommendations
are difficult to understand.

0–13 points

Summary
of learning related to this assignment

20
points

Thoroughly summarizes
learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of
data

18–20 points

Clearly summarizes
learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of
data

16–17 points

Briefly summarizes
learning related to performance measurement assignment; does not include
value of data

14–15 points

Summary of learning
related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data, is
missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain

0–13 points

Scholarly
writing and formatting

10
points

All slides are
provided and

grammar, punctuation,
and sentence structure are correct.

There is evidence of
spell and grammar check.

9–10 points

Minimal errors in
grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted.

Minimal indicators of
spelling or grammar errors.

8 points

Several errors in
grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted.

There are several
indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

7 points

Multiple typos are noted.

Multiple grammar and
punctuation errors are noted.

There is no evidence
of proofreading prior to submitting the assignment.

There are several
indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

0–6 points

Total Points
Possible = 200

Your
Score=

A quality assignment
will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Course Outcomes, NR447 Week 6 Paper help

Purpose

Course Outcomes

Due Dates

Points

Directions

Grading Criteria: Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow

Grading Rubric

About us

Quick Links

We Accept

CONTACT US

We can write your essays! Let our essay writing experts help you get that A in your next essay. Place your order today, and you will enjoy it. No plagiarism.

Purpose

Course Outcomes

Due Dates

Points

Directions

Grading Criteria: Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow

Grading Rubric

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today! Get a 15% discount for your first order

About us

Quick Links

We Accept

CONTACT US

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today!
Get a 15% discount for your first order