Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence (EQ) Paper

Instructions: Complete “Management: Self-Assessment” located on the McGraw-Hill website; then compose a GCU style paper (750-1000 words), describing your Emotional Intelligence (EQ). findings. Being aware of what emotional responses look like and its importance when interacting in social settings. Compare and contrast your EQ to someone you interact with. Please include 3 to 4 references from the readings and videos this week to support your ideas. Use appropriate citation and referencing. Address the following in your paper:

1. Complete the stress self-assessment located on the McGraw-Hill website http://www.mhhe.com/business/management/buildyourmanagementskills/updated_flash/topic5a/quiz.html

2. Address the following in your paper:

· How can we be “in check” with our emotions? What are some consequences of not being “in check” with our emotions? What are some strategies for managing our emotions? How do we ensure that our emotional state is appropriate when interacting with our family, friends, significant others, and peers?

· Compare and contrast your EQ results to someone you interact with? How does this impact your relationship with that individual?

 

Refer to the Topic 2 readings to assist in completing this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rubris:

 

Emotional Intelligence (EQ) Paper 

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
 

70.0 %Content

 

 
 

40.0 %Explain the importance of being in check with one’s emotions. Reflect on the consequences of not being in check with one’s emotions.

 

Vague or incomplete description of the importance of emotional reflection and consequences of not managing emotions. Only facts are stated; evidence of understanding of the concepts is not present.

 

Presents a general description or aspects of the importance of emotional reflection and consequences of not managing emotions. Lacks coherency of material. Does touch on topics but is limited or undeveloped in details, rationales, and/or examples are present.

 

Presents direct and focused descriptions of the importance of emotional reflection and consequences of not managing emotions.

 

Presents detailed, direct, and focused descriptions of the importance of emotional reflection and consequences of not managing emotions. Information accurately reflects the course materials. Theories are explored in-depth and comparisons integrate supporting examples and details into rationale. Attempts to make some connections that others do not make between ideas are present.

 

Presents in-depth, direct, and focused descriptions of the importance of emotional reflection and consequences of not managing emotions. Information accurately reflects the course materials and other scholarly sources. Theories, principals, and behavior comparisons are explored and connected to multiple examples and details. Draws complex factors from research.

 
 

30.0 %Compare and contrast your Emotional IQ results to the results of an additional individual. Explain how these results impact the relationship.

 

Does not provide a comparison of results. Evidence used to support rationale is absent.

 

Describes and compares briefly two sets of Emotional Intelligence results. Describes and compares briefly the impact these results have on the relationship. Limited evidence is used to support rationale. Rationale relies on own beliefs, and is not supported by scientific evidence.

 

Broadly describes and compares two sets of Emotional Intelligence results. Broadly describes and compares the impact these results have on the relationship. Multiple perspectives are integrated. Evidence is used to support rationale. Effectively incorporates one’s own beliefs supported by research.

 

Provides a focused and detailed explanation of the two sets of Emotional Intelligence results, and the impact the results have on the relationship. Multiple perspectives are integrated. Evidence is used to support rationale. Draws unexpected, fresh, and integrative conclusions.

 

Provides a thorough explanation of the two sets of Emotional Intelligence results, and the impact the results have on the relationship in a variety of contexts. Multiple perspectives are integrated. Evidence is used to support rationale and takes an original, unique, imaginative approach.

 
 

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

 
 

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

 

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

 

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

 

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

 

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

 

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

 
 

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

 

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

 

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

 

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

 

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

 

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

 
 

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

 

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

 

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

 

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

 

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

 

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

 
 

10.0 %Format

 

 
 

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

 

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

 

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

 

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

 

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

 

All format elements are correct.

 
 

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

 

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

 

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

 

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

 

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

 

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

 
 

100 %Total Weightage

 

   

 

 

 

© 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW