Q1. Details: Mintzberg’s Organizational Types: When Jack and Jill launched their Internet-based… 1 answer below »

We can write your essays! Let our essay writing experts help you get that A in your next essay. Place your order today, and you will enjoy it. No plagiarism.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Q1.

Details:

Mintzberg's Organizational Types:

When Jack and Jill launched their Internet-based data storage and backup service, they began with a basic entrepreneurial structure. Now, the company is growing, and Jack and Jill need to make some decisions regarding the structure of the company. The external environment in this industry is complex and changing. This assignment will allow you to interact with Mintzberg’s model of organizational types to critique organizational structures and propose a research-based structure for Jack and Jill. You will also explore the dynamics of designing an organizational structure.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. View and interact with the model of Mintzberg’s Five Organizational Types. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

In a paper of 1,000-1,250 words, address the following questions: Which of Mintzberg’s organizational types should Jack and Jill target as the next organizational structure of their company? Support your choice with current scholarly research in addition to Mintzberg. What does contemporary scholarly research indicate are the conditions that must be in place for a structural change to be appropriate? According to contemporary scholarly research, how should Jack and Jill design and implement the appropriate transition plan from the entrepreneurial structure to their chosen next structure as the company grows? Top of Form

Apply Rubrics

Q2.

Details:

In today’s workplace, it is expected that workers will encounter technology in some form. There are varied perspectives regarding the use of technology in the workplace. In this assignment, you will assess two of these perspectives by presenting a debate of those perspectives and concluding with your assessment of the preferred perspective.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Perspectives, rebuttals, and conclusions must be adequately supported with current, relevant, scholarly research. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

In a paper of 1,000-1,250 words, debate two opposing perspectives on technology in the workplace. Structure your paper as a debate as follows: Introduction First perspective Rebuttal to first perspective Second perspective Rebuttal to second perspective Concluding remarks (including your assessment of the most appropriate perspective)

Apply Rubric

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Statement of Next Structure

No statement of a possible next structure is presented.

A statement of a possible next structure is presented. The statement does not correlate to Mintzberg's organizational types. No research in addition to Mintzberg is presented in support of the choice.

A statement of a possible next structure is presented. The statement alludes to Mintzberg's organizational types, but the correlation is not strong. Research in addition to Mintzberg is presented in support of the choice, but it is not from scholarly sources and the sources are outdated.

A statement of a possible next structure is presented. The statement correlates to Mintzberg's organizational types. Scholarly research in addition to Mintzberg is presented in support of the choice but the sources are outdated.

A statement of a possible next structure is presented. The statement directly correlates to Mintzberg's organizational types. Scholarly current research in addition to Mintzberg is presented in support of the choice.

20.0 %Statement of Conditions for Structural Change

No statement of the appropriate conditions for structural change is presented.

A statement of the appropriate conditions for structural change is presented. No research is presented in support of the choice.

A statement of the appropriate conditions for structural change is presented. Research is presented in support of the choice, but it is not from scholarly sources and the sources are outdated.

A statement of the appropriate conditions for structural change is presented. Scholarly research is presented in support of the choice, but the sources are outdated.

A statement of the appropriate conditions for structural change is presented. Current scholarly research is presented in support of the choice.

20.0 %Statement of Implementing the Transition Plan

No statement of how to implement the transition is presented.

A statement of how to implement the transition is presented. No research is presented in support of the plan.

A statement of how to implement the transition is presented. Research is presented in support of the plan, but it is not from scholarly sources and the sources are outdated.

A statement of how to implement the transition e is presented. Scholarly research is presented in support of the plan, but the sources are outdated.

A statement of how to implement the transition is presented. Current scholarly research is presented in support of the plan.

10.0 %Synthesis and Argument

No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.

Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.

25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing

Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

5.0 %APA Format

Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.

100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form

Writerbay.net

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today!

Get a 15% discount for your first order


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper