During the course of your employment you may have experienced working for both a male and female supervisor. Discuss from your personal point of view the advantages/disadvantages and like/dislike of working for each gender. Use real life experiences if applicable.
Read and respond to at least two (2) of your classmates’ posts. In your response to your classmates, consider comparing your articles to those of your classmates. Below are additional suggestions on how to respond to your classmates’ discussions:
· Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
· Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
· Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research.
· Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
· Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
· Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Reply to first topic:-
Leadership can be tough and enjoyable at the same time, and no gender is better than the other in leading an organization, both male and female supervisors can do best at their job if they dedicate their time at the organization. But each gender has different leadership characteristics and styles depending on the gender; female leaders are focused on completing the tasks that are assigned to them and organization with such a leader tends to realize their goals in good time (Lo, Peters, & Kok, 2011). But male leaders are only focused in performance, and this can be good to some extent because when only one team is focused on performing then they will not be willing to share the information with other members of the team and this can derail performance.
Female leaders are known to use the indirect form of communication which can be a setback to the organizations performance as team members requires constant communication but on the other hand, male leaders communicate directly, and they can detect problems in the team the moment they arise, and this can be a plus to the organization. Female leaders promote corporation and collaboration, and this creates a good environment for, but every member should be assigned a role to avoid redundancy (Lott, 1981). Male leaders prefer competition, and this kills the spirit of teamwork in the organization as the team members will always strive to outshine the other. For example, in an organization that I used to work for being supervised by a male leader he used only to foster good performance and our team members used to look for ways to achieve their best hence not willing to share information that can help elevate other team members.
Just like a mother will mentor her child to be the best in everything that they try to do, a female leader will always mentor the team members to be the best at their workplaces so that they can move forward in their carrier ladder. Mentoring and training other team members are essential as this will also help them to chip in and help one another with their work if their co-worker is not in for work. Male leaders also portray a hierarchical structure and this is beneficial to the organization as each member of the team will know what is expected of them and who to report to in times of crisis. In conclusion, both genders can make good leaders and what they need to do is to learn what the other gender is good at to be able to emulate so that they can improve their leadership skills.
Reply to topic 2:
In my point of view , It works in the Information Technology , that been supervised with the working style of both male and female supervisors in which the career in which we have brought the gender in a way as they can be perspective which the supervisor in which it comes with the ability that depends on the skill as well as discipline and the way the attitude of the person in which the way in which they supervise in which the person can guide the team . A personality is the way in which the people has nothing varies with the gender (Johansson , & Wennblom , 2017 ) .
In the recent way there is the significant way in which it can increased which can have the female supervisors in which the IT environment which can have people that can be stereotype which can advantage the person can be always based on the way in which the capability as they depend on the gender , Race in which they can be differentaiated people (Eagly , & Carli 2003 ).
The way in which we can supervise the way in which the way can be good in handling the way in which resposnibilities in which the team guides .So the way in which we can evaluate in which the work is based on the gender in which it can be discriminated such a way the person which can be within the team in which the gender criteria that can have the company organization that can be reputated with the company culture . The advantage or disadvantage in which we can supervise the way in which we can match the personalities in which the dislikes the way in which it may have the concerns that can judge the way as they decided the decision .Finishing the assignments in time that can run up the organization which can have the transformational in which the pioneers which can build up the capacity that can contribute that can be with maximum capacity which can drive the leadership style which can have the experience which can be authorized that can pioneer which can have the discussion in which that can be pioneer in which that can be unable in which the business that connect the individual connections (Cupac , 2014) .