Research Scenario Scoring Guide

8/19/20, 12:55 PMResearch Scenario Scoring Guide

Page 1 of 2https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MULTI/MULTI7860/200700_10x/Scoring_Guides/u06a1_scoring_guide.html

Research Scenario Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Week 6 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Evaluate the qualitative research approach for the scenario provided. 15%

Does not evaluate the qualitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the qualitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluate the qualitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the qualitative research approach for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate the quantitative research approach for the scenario provided. 15%

Does not evaluate the quantitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the quantitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the quantitative research approach for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the quantitative research approach for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate the literature review for the scenario provided. 12%

Does not evaluate the literature review for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the literature review for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the literature review for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the literature review for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate theory for the scenario provided. 12%

Does not evaluate theory for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates theory for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates theory for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates theory for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate the ethical considerations for the scenario provided. 12%

Does not evaluate the ethical considerations for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the ethical considerations for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the ethical considerations for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the ethical considerations for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate the introduction for the scenario provided. 12%

Does not evaluate the introduction for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the introduction for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the introductions for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the introduction for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Evaluate the purpose statement for the scenario provided. 12%

Does not evaluate the purpose statement for the scenario provided.

Partially evaluates the purpose statement for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the purpose statement for the scenario provided.

Accurately evaluates the purpose statement for the scenario provided. The analysis is well justified, logical, and thorough.

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and

Fails to communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and

Communicates in a manner that is partly scholarly, professional, and consistent with the

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and

Communicates in a manner that is completely scholarly, professional, and

 

 

8/19/20, 12:55 PMResearch Scenario Scoring Guide

Page 2 of 2https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MULTI/MULTI7860/200700_10x/Scoring_Guides/u06a1_scoring_guide.html

consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting. 10%

consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting.

expectations for members of an identified field of study, but inconsistently employs APA style and formatting.

consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting.

consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting few or no errors.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW