Understanding “Internet plagiarism”Author links open overlay panelRebecca MooreHowardShow moreAdd to MendeleyShareCitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2006.12.005Get rights and contentAbstract Curren

Understanding “Internet plagiarism”Author links open overlay panelRebecca MooreHowardShow moreAdd to MendeleyShareCitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2006.12.005Get rights and contentAbstract

Current concerns about plagiarism participate in a culture-wide anxiety that mirrors the cultural climate in previous textual revolutions. In today’s revolution, the Internet is described as the cause of a perceived increase in plagiarism, and plagiarism-detecting services (PDSs) are described as the best solution. The role of the Internet should be understood, however, not just in terms of access to text but also in terms of textual relationships. Synthesizing representations of iText with literary theories of intertextuality suggests that all writers work intertextually, all readers interpret texts intertextually, and new media not only increase the number of texts through which both writers and readers work but also offer interactive information technologies in which unacknowledged appropriation from sources does not necessarily invalidate the text. Plagiarism-detecting services, in contrast, describe textual appropriation solely in terms of individual ethics. The best response to concerns about plagiarism is revised institutional plagiarism policies combined with authentic pedagogy that derives from an understanding of IText, intertextuality, and new media.